The interest in stem cell research can date back to the
introduction and popularity of microscopes in the 18th century. http://www.nobelprize.org/educational/physics/microscopes/timeline/
Cells were recognized as the building blocks of life and in
the mid 1800’s the discovery was made that some cells could generate other cells.
Researchers found that various types of blood cells came
from a particular “stem cell”. In 1963, Ernest A McCulloch and James E Till
documented the first quantitative descriptions on self-renewing activities of
transplanted mouse bone marrow cells.
“In
1973 a moratorium was placed on government funding for human embryo research.
In 1988 a NIH panel voted 19 to 2 in favor of government funding. In 1990,
Congress voted to override the moratorium on government funding of embryonic
stem cell research, which was vetoed by President George Bush. President
Clinton lifted the ban, but changed his mind the following year after public
outcry. Congress banned federal funding in 1995. In 1998 DHHS Secretary
Sullivan extended the moratorium. In 2000, President Bill Clinton allowed
funding of research on cells derived from aborted human fetuses, but not from
embryonic cells. On August 9, 2001, President George W. Bush announced his
decision to allow Federal funding of research only on existing human embryonic
stem cell lines created prior to his announcement. His concern was to not
foster the continued destruction of living human embryos. In 2004, both houses
of Congress have asked President George W. Bush to review his policy on
embryonic stem cell research. President George W. Bush released a statement
reiterating his moral qualms about creating human embryos to destroy them, and
refused to reverse the federal policy banning government funding of ESC
research”.
On April 26,2005 the National Academies released “Guidelines
from Human Embryonic Cell Research and new guidelines and restrictions keep
producing up until December 3. 2008.
In 2009 President Obama removes barriers to responsible scientific
research involving human stem cells.
The main players include scientists, religious leaders,
government officials, investors, advocates, and potential patients.
The Republican platform opposes stem cell research while the
Democrats support the research. Opponents believe that the destruction of a
fertilized embryo for research purposes is immoral. Supporters disregard an
embryo that will never mature to become a living being is a morally unsound
act. The embryo in question could provide stem cells that in return could save
lives.
However, this debate is not always black or white. Some
support adult stem cell research, while others are against both embryonic and
adult stem cell research. Concerns are also present for those who support the
research such as technology and monetary abuse. The real question becomes whether
or not society can handle the new power responsibly rather than whether
progress is good or bad.
In your conclusion you mention that republicans oppose stem cell research; however, in my blog http://crystalaustell.blogspot.com/ I have clear evidence that Mitt Romney, the republican candidate, is very blatant in saying he fully supports some stem cell research. He doesn't support research that involves killing embryos or creating new human organisms through cloning. My blog and the following link proves this point. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f41Vz8E35is
ReplyDeleteThis is a video that shows all of the diseases that can be cured through stem cell research. It is a bit biased but I think it sets the stage well for stem cell research, it also shows one of the downside to stem cell research which is how expensive it is. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVkn9LaUoMo
ReplyDeleteYou didn't set the scene of your argument here is a youtube clip http://m.youtube.com/index?&desktop_uri=%2F#/watch?v=DVkn9LaUoMo that covers the issues that stem cells affect setting up your blog to the reader, which isn't the microscope.
ReplyDeleteDidn't even mention the ASCAAC = major player in stem cell research. They do most work in the field.
ReplyDeleteThis link shows their organization
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYe6OTaCG74
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDTX7NLDLNg
ReplyDeleteSo this does define the origin of stem cell research, but it does not define what this issue needs. It needs the origin of pro/anti-stem cell research.
Maybe you should have a cartoon that sets up the argument...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/aba/lowres/aban434l.jpg
Instead of starting with the history of the microscope, shouldn't you start with the history of the topic at hand? Here, look at this link: http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/history-of-stem-cell-research-faq.htm
ReplyDeleteYou are biased in the sense that you say that some scientists think one way and some think a different way, but you gave your opinion as well. Also you need a causal roadmap. Its confusing because you go from one idea to the next without staying on a step by step roadmap. Here is a video with a steady roadmap. Short and to the point.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVkn9LaUoMo
I noticed you have a couple undefined terms right off the bat, such as the distinctions like embryonic cells, or even what a stem cell in the first place. Its really hard to have a good discussion when you haven't clearly defined terms. This video can offer a little background on some definitions involved in the debate over stem cells.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhcCWXtvKlg
What are you talking about? Democrat never made the claim that disregarding all living embryo is morally acceptable. They only support research on embryo that were about to be discarded due to failed mutual fertilization. Heres a video showing President Obama's stand on the issue:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j6t604b72I&feature=related
You state that stem cell research began with the microscope, but your cited website states that it began in the "mid 1800's with the discovery that some cells could generate other cells".
ReplyDeleteYour link: http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/history-of-stem-cell-research-faq.htm
Hi! I noticed that although you gave background information on the history of stem cell research, you did not define what stem cells actually are in relation to their cell potency. The different potency of cells is essential in understanding why stem cells are special and significant today in research. Here's a video that elaborates my point; check out 3:02: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZA3QFliteA
ReplyDelete